Werner Güth How Do Players Split an Amount of Money in the Ultimatum Game?

Werner Güth is the Director of the Strategic Interaction Group at the Max Planck Institute of Economics, in Jena. Previously, Güth was professor at the Humboldt-University, Berlin. His specific take on economics, particularly game theory, experimental economics and microeconomics, is shaped by a strong interest in the social sciences, such as psychology and philosophy. In the field of game theory, Güth traces back one of the most famous economic experiments, following the psychological decision making processes of two game players. His research is set to account for different outcomes of the game, when it is modified.

Area of Research

Economic Theory, Philosophy, Political Sciences

since 2002

Professor

Friedrich Schiller University Jena (Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena)

since 2015

Senior Professor

Frankfurt School of Finance & Management

2001-2014

Director of the Strategic Interaction Group

Max Planck Society

Max Planck Institute of Economics

1994-2001

Professor

Humboldt University of Berlin (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin)

1986-1994

Professor

Goethe University of Frankfurt (Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main)

1977-1986

Professor

University of Cologne (Universität zu Köln)

1976

Habilitation

University of Münster (Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster)

Faculty of Economics

1972

PhD in Economics

University of Münster (Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster)

Faculty of Economics

1970

Diploma in Economics

University of Münster (Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster)

Faculty of Economics

Fellowships

- Honorary Doctorate from the University of Tübingen (2010)

The ultimatum game is one of the most famous experiments in economics. It involves two players, one of them receives a sum of money which he has to share with a second player. The first player, the “proposer”, can decide how much he offers the second player, called “responder”, who can either accept or reject the offer. If the responder rejects, neither of the players receives any money. Mathematically, the first intuition is to offer the opponent the smallest amount possible. However, during the game players routinely reject even high offers if they deem the split unfair. In this video, WERNER GÜTH explains how he came to develop the ultimatum game and how modifications of the game produce different outcomes.

LT Video Publication DOI: https://doi.org/10.21036/LTPUB10159

An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining

  • Werner Güth, Rolf Schmittberger and Bernd Schwarze
  • Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
  • Published in 1982
Werner Güth, Rolf Schmittberger and Bernd Schwarze. "An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining." Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3 (1982): 367-388.

How Werner Güth's Ultimatum Game Shaped Our Understanding of Social Behavior

  • Eric van Damme, Kenneth G. Binmore, Alvin E. Roth, Larry Samuelson, Eyal Winter, Gary E. Bolton, Axel Ockenfels, Martin Dufwenberg, Georg Kirchsteiger and Uri Gneezy
  • Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
  • Published in 2014
Eric van Damme, Kenneth G. Binmore, Alvin E. Roth, Larry Samuelson, Eyal Winter, Gary E. Bolton, Axel Ockenfels, Martin Dufwenberg, Georg Kirchsteiger and Uri Gneezy. "How Werner Güth's Ultimatum Game Shaped Our Understanding of Social Behavior." Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 108 (2014): 292-318.

Evolutionarily Stable Co-Operative Commitments

  • Werner Güth and Hartmut Kliemt
  • Theory and Decision
  • Published in 2000
Werner Güth and Hartmut Kliemt. "Evolutionarily Stable Co-Operative Commitments." Theory and Decision 49 (2000): 197-222.